Which of the following is NOT a consequence of failing to comply with Colorado's security regulations?

The choice indicating mandatory retirement from service is not a consequence of failing to comply with Colorado's security regulations. In the context of security regulation compliance, consequences typically revolve around legal and financial repercussions rather than employment status related to retirement.

Criminal charges can arise from serious violations of the law, highlighting the legal implications of non-compliance. Similarly, penalties and fines serve as financial consequences intended to enforce compliance with the regulations. The revocation of a security license also plays a crucial role in ensuring that individuals and companies meet the required standards to provide security services.

Mandatory retirement, on the other hand, is not a recognized form of punishment or consequence within the regulatory framework governing security officers in Colorado. Typically, retirement is based on age or tenure rather than compliance issues. This distinction is essential for understanding the implications of security regulations in Colorado.